Showing posts with label Software News. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Software News. Show all posts

Experts: Chinese censorware carries botnet risk

Experts have warned of serious security flaws in the Chinese government's censorship software, which could open the door to hackers creating huge botnets.
##CONTINUE##
Programming errors in the Green Dam Youth Escort software, which the Chinese Ministry of Industry and Information Technology said on Tuesday must be pre-installed on all new computers in the country, are at the root of the flaws, according to experts from the University of Michigan.

"Once Green Dam is installed, any Web site the user visits can exploit these problems to take control of the computer," wrote the university's researchers. "This could allow malicious sites to steal private data, send spam or enlist the computer in a botnet."

The warning came in a paper published on Thursday by researchers Scott Wolchok, Randy Yao and J Alex Halderman.

The Green Dam software filters content by blocking URLs and Web site images and by monitoring text in other applications. The filtering blacklists include both political and adult content.

The researchers said that after only one day of testing Green Dam, they discovered programming errors in the code used to process Web site requests. These would result in buffer over-run conditions on all computers running the software, they said.

"The code processes URLs with a fixed-length buffer, and a specially crafted URL can overrun this buffer and corrupt the execution stack," said the researchers.

"Any Web site the user visits can redirect the browser to a page with a malicious URL and take control of the computer."

The researchers built a proof-of-concept program to demonstrate the flaw and said it would crash any computer running Green Dam.

In addition, Green Dam can be used to install any other program on a computer, via a blacklist vulnerability. This problem would allow Green Dam's makers, or a third-party impersonating them, to execute arbitrary code and install malicious software on the user's computer, after installing a filter update.

Chinese government news agency Xinhua reported that Jinhui Computer System Engineering, which developed Green Dam, had said the software was not spyware.

"Our software is simply not capable of spying on internet users, it is only a filter," Jinhui is quoted as saying.

The Xinhua article did not address whether the filter itself could be used to upload spyware.

The University of Michigan researchers recommended that anybody running Green Dam uninstall the software immediately.

However, according to a translation of feedback on Jinhui's user forum, teachers and educational establishments have no choice but to use the software.

"Let me say something here," wrote one teacher. "We were forced to install the software. So I have to come to this Web site and curse. After we installed the software, many normal Web sites are banned."

-----------------------------
BY Tom Espiner, CNET News.com
Source:ZDNet

Copyright © 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved.

“绿坝”身世之谜:谁赢得了4170万元订单

一纸来自工业和信息化部(下称“工信部”)的价值4170万元“订单”,让郑州金惠计算机系统工程有限公司(下称“郑州金惠”)和北京大正语言知识处理有限公司(下称“北京大正”)一夜成名。
##CONTINUE##
郑州金惠和北京大正通过开发一款名为“绿坝花季护航”的上网过滤软件,分别分得了2180万元和1990万元人民币的合同金额,此后,工信部还有望通过政府采购的方式,每年向两家企业购买使用权,然后供社会免费使用。

那么,如此巨大的“收益”何以归于郑州金惠和北京大正?这或许才是“绿坝花季护航”作为一个商业故事的核心所在。

胜者“身世”
赢得一年4170万元“合同大单”的郑州金惠和北京大正,究竟何许人也?如果仅仅把他们看做是两个创新型的科技企业,一切似乎就太简单了。

记者调查获知,北京大正系内资公司,注册资本金为1000万元,但其中700万元为“知识产权出资”,法人代表孟东豫,由中科院声学研究所和北京麦纳新技术有限公司(下称“北京麦纳”)共同组建,孟东豫同时还是北京麦纳的法人代表。

蹊跷的是,出资成立北京大正的麦纳公司系在北京大正公司成立之后方才设立,而据本报记者掌握的情况,北京大正于2000年成立。

而郑州金惠的董事长周慧琴则在此前曾担任中科院下属的科海集团的党委书记兼常务副总裁。

而记者掌握的情况表明,在强制预装绿坝花季护航软件的消息公诸媒体之前,工信部已经分别向中小学校和各大PC厂商发出通知,要求在出厂过程中,强制预装该软件。其中,由教育部转发给各中小学的通知中,明确规定截止期限为2009年5月。

经查证,北京大正法人代表孟东豫名下还有多家公司,如北京软媒视频技术研究院、北京麦宁科贸有限公司、北京基尔斯电讯技术开发有限责任公司等,其中北京麦宁科贸有限公司还处在“吊销”状态。

更为微妙的是,北京大正的分公司还曾在深圳市地税局的欠税名单之上,深圳市国家税务局深国税告[2008]4号文件显示,北京大正深圳分公司欠缴企业所得税总计563.22万元。

利益几何
6月12日下午,《中国经营报》记者来到位于北京市海淀区人民大学附近的北京大正办公地点——威地科技大厦7层,该公司工作人员告诉记者,北京大正于2002年在此办公,此办公地的总计人数大约有70人左右。

在其公司的墙壁上悬挂着营业执照、某大学科研中心等多项证明文件,“北京大正”的字样并不明显,仅见于营业执照之上。显然,“绿坝花季护航”的开发并非该公司的唯一一项业务,但正是这一个软件产品的开发,给北京大正带来了一年1990万元人民币的现金收入。

记者了解到,当日,该公司法人代表孟东豫正在外地出差。“这完全是一个商业行为,与政府没有任何关系。”郑州金惠总经理张晨民在接受媒体记者采访时表示。而搞清“绿坝花季护航”软件为两家企业带来收益的最简单办法,就是搞清该软件的开发成本。

来自业界权威安全厂商的人士表示,此类过滤软件的开发并不复杂,其成本至多不会高于10万元。该人士还曾对该软件进行过详细分析,发现绿坝软件的图像识别部分甚至使用了来自互联网的开源代码,而按照工信部公示的信息显示,图像部分的识别由郑州金惠负责开发。

6月11日,网易科技频道挂出的消息也表明,绿坝软件的破译技术难度并不大,网上甚至已经出现了破解该款软件密码的示意教程。

6月10日晚,中央电视台《晚间新闻》中援引工信部相关负责人的话称,“绿坝花季护航”不会监控网民的个人信息以及上网行为,只是过滤色情等不良网络信息,该软件在PC终端上亦可由使用者自行卸载。

但正是这一款可以自行卸载的软件,工信部正在准备以政府采购的形式向开发者支付使用费,供社会免费安装使用,由此,“绿坝花季护航”被外界称为中国覆盖率最高的“正版软件”。

前述业界权威安全厂商的人士还透露,类似安全软件的销售如果是随硬件绑定,一般会按照终端点数的多少来进行定价。诸如微软的windows操作系统,只要硬件厂商预装数量足够大,其售价并不高,一般为几十元至几百元。

垄断嫌疑
就在工信部6月9日公布的《关于计算机预装绿色上网过滤软件的通知》之后三天,亦有法律界、学界人士致函国务院和国家反垄断委员会,指出工信部下发的通知涉嫌违反《反垄断法》,此前亦有律师向工信部提出申请,要求进行信息公开。

记者了解到,向国务院致函的两人,系媒介法专家魏永征和中国青年政治学院副教授、知名律师周泽。

两人致函国务院的信件中指出,强制预装的要求,涉嫌滥用行政权力,排除和限制竞争,违反了《反垄断法》的规定。目前金山等安全软件都可以提供类似过滤功能,甚至微软vista系统也预置了相关功能。工信部要求计算机预装“绿坝花季护航”软件,可能限制和排除其他同类软件经营者与“绿坝花季护航”软件经营者的竞争。开发、生产与“绿坝花季护航”软件类似软件产品的企业,应享有公平竞争的权利。

“我们认为,当前对公众威胁最大的是木马、病毒等恶意代码,作为志在保护公众隐私的技术型公司,对于什么是信息不良网站,我们其实很难去做评价。”旗下拥有360安全卫士和软件管家的奇虎公司董事长周鸿祎告诉《中国经营报》记者,绿色过滤软件更多是由孩子家长控制的市场,而非大众市场。因此,国内知名安全厂商诸如360、金山、瑞星等,尽管软件均具备类似功能,但都没有针对该细分市场推出专项产品。

一个由软件引发的故事,或许刚刚开始。

-----------------------------
文章出处:中国经营报
作者:N/A

绿坝被指侵犯知识产权及违反开源协议

上网过滤软件“绿坝-花季护航”(简称绿坝)名声大噪后,引起了国际社会的关注。美国密歇根大学的一位教授称绿坝侵犯了开源协议,另外一家名为Solid Oak的美国公司则表示绿坝侵犯了其知识产权。
##CONTINUE##
绿坝的开发公司之一、北京大正语言知识处理科技公司一位负责人表示,他们目前不能就绿坝一事发表评论。

绿坝被指违反开源协议
6月12日,美国密歇根大学计算机科学与工程系J. Alex Halderman教授发表了一份绿坝分析报告,其中提到绿坝包含多个安全漏洞,建议安装了的用户立即卸载。同时,报告还指出,绿坝违反了开源协议。

Halderman在报告中分析,绿坝主要用于不良图像过滤的文件cximage.dll、CImage.dll、xcore.dll和Xcv.dll均来自OpenCV。OpenCV是Intel资助的一个开源的计算机视觉库,它有一系列 C 函数和少量 C++ 类构成,实现了图像处理和计算机视觉方面的很多通用算法。

OpenCV中国的项目负责人此前向媒体表示,他检测后发现,绿坝的核心识别程序文件XFImage.xml完全来自OpenCV的haarcascade_frontalface_alt2.xml,绿坝只是将源文件中的版权信息删除,内容跟OpenCV提供的文件完全相同。

中国开源软件推进联盟副秘书长袁萌教授向新浪科技解读,OpenCV采用的是BSD许可证,当商业软件使用其开源程序时,需要在软件版权信息中加上BSD许可证声明,绿坝并未在其软件中加入这一声明。袁萌认为,这同样也是侵权。

美国公司计划起诉绿坝侵权
据国外媒体报道,美国一家名为Solid Oak的公司计划起诉绿坝侵犯其知识产权。Solid Oak公司创办人Brian Milburn表示,绿坝的部分代码是从他们拥有知识产权的商业软件中窃取,他计划向美国当地的法庭申请禁令,阻止中国开发商出售绿坝软件。不过他坦承,此事成功的难度很大,因为涉及到管辖权的问题,Solid oak公司需要到中国、按照中国的法律进行起诉。据了解,Solid oak公司是一个不到20人的小公司。

上述美国密歇根大学的Halderman教授在其报告中指出,绿坝的网站黑名单档案是来自Solid Oak公司的CyberSitter程序。报告还指出,更为巧合的是,绿坝的程序还“意外”的含有CyberSitter程序2004年发布的一份新闻简报。

绿坝软件的两家开发公司暂未对上述信息置评。

公开资料显示,绿坝的开发公司之一、郑州计算机系统工程有限公司的相关负责人对外表示,其图形过滤技术获得了国家三项发明专利,还获得过第九届、第十二届国际软件博览会金奖。

-----------------------------
文章出处:新浪科技
作者:立雄

IBM expects Linux to make money

IBM has combined its “church” and “state” Linux functions under Bob Sutor, whose title now reads vice president of open source and Linux. (Picture from the resume page of Sutor’s Web site.)
##CONTINUE##
In the latest installment of his podcast interviews, Linux Foundation executive director Jim Zemlin found Sutor focused mainly on opportunities for server and cloud Linux, through partnerships with Red Hat and Novell.

A rush transcript has been posted to the Linux Foundation web site, for those who find reading faster than listening.

Sutor’s latest promotion gave him not only corporate responsibility for Linux but profit responsibility also.

“If it’s IBM software, and if it runs on Linux, I care about it, and from a software company perspective, we want to sell more of it,” he told Zemlin, and much of the discussion involved IBM’s search for Linux profits.

Sutor described Linux as a secret sauce that lets it sell complete systems which may include Tivoli management, Rational tools, Websphere web servers, and IBM hardware. He said IBM currently has over 500 software products running on Linux and over 30,000 Linux desktops.

Still, IBM is tightly focused on server sales and the development of clouds, which can be sold, rented, or deliver profitable services.

For cloud computing, “why wouldn’t you run it on Linux?” he asked, because Linux can deliver all kinds of virtualization and those who want Windows desktops need never know they’re not.

(Picture of tux in a suit from IBM developer Tung-Sing Chong.)

Thanks to clouds IBM can profitably deliver thousands of desktops that look like Windows but have Linux on the back-end. It can also sell servers that are compatible with its clouds at the deepest level. Its alliance with Novell assures Windows file compatibility, and the one with Red Hat helps it in the corporate market.

Sutor also said IBM’s intense efforts on behalf of the Open Docuement Format are centered on interoperability:

by driving something like OpenDocument Format, it means you could have an organization that used these tools, and some people could be on Windows, and some could be on Linux, and some could be on the Mac, and some could be on iPhones, and some could be on Android phones, and so forth and so forth.

Thanks in part to IBM’s work, Sutor said, some 16 governments are now either mandating ODF or “suggesting it very strongly,” which can be almost as good.

Sutor and Zemlin also discussed what might be called the “corporate-cloud boundary,” the point in the growth of an enterprise system where building a cloud starts to make economic sense. Clouds start to make sense when heavy virtualization takes place, Sutor said, and there are new problems to solve.

But Sutor also defended the enterprise model:

if you’re purely looking at Enterprise workloads, no—it’s not all going to go to a cloud. It may not even be the majority of it goes to the cloud.

One final point Sutor made is that cloud computing will not always be a Linux lake. There will be clouds that, for technical or billing reasons, run things other than Linux. IBM will be happy to build them, if it can make money at it.

And that’s the real bottom line here. For Sutor today, the bottom line is the bottom line. I see nothing wrong with that. Having profit going to vendors who use Linux may be the best possible advertisement for open source. And IBM is doing that.

-----------------------------
BY Dana Blankenhorn
Source:ZDNet

Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved.

Microsoft may deliver prompts for rival browsers

It will now be up to PC makers to decide whether to install Internet Explorer or another browser on the computers they sell.
##CONTINUE##
Microsoft bowed to pressure from European regulators and announced it would release its Windows 7 operating system in Europe without its Internet Explorer web browser.

The US software giant said it still plans to release its next-generation operating system worldwide on October 22, but that customers in Europe will have to install web browsers of their choice.

"We're committed to making Windows 7 available in Europe at the same time that it launches in the rest of the world, but we also must comply with European competition law as we launch the product," Microsoft deputy general counsel Dave Heiner said.

"Given the pending legal proceeding, we've decided that instead of including Internet Explorer in Windows 7 in Europe, we will offer it separately and on an easy-to-install basis to both computer manufacturers and users."

It will now be up to PC makers to decide whether to install Internet Explorer8 or another browser on the computers they sell.

"We believe that this new approach, while not our first choice, is the best path forward given the ongoing legal case in Europe," Mr Heiner said.

In January, the European Commission said its preliminary view was that Microsoft had stifled competition in the browser market by packaging Internet Explorer and Windows together.

The antitrust investigation was prompted by a complaint from Opera, a rival browser, who was later joined in the action by Google. Internet Explorer is the most popular browser worldwide but its market share has been under attack by Mozilla's Firefox and others. Opera wanted Microsoft to offer users a choice of browsers automatically when they used their computers.

Microsoft has argued that the browser is an integral part of the user's experience and should be bundled together with the operating system. It said users were free top choose another browser if they wished.

Mr Heiner said Microsoft expects that stripping IE from Windows 7 will bolster its position that it is not bundling software in order to suffocate competition. But the Commission is likely to continue its investigations and may hit Microsoft with a fine, expected in some quarters to approach the record $1.49 billion fine recently levied on Intel.

"We will continue to discuss browser issues and other matters with the Commission," Mr Heiner said.

He added: "The E(uropean) versions of Windows 7 will include all the features and functionality of Windows 7 in the rest of the world, other than browsing with Internet Explorer. Computer manufacturers will be able to add any browser they want to their Windows 7 machines, including Internet Explorer, so European consumers who purchase new PCs will be able to access the internet without any problem. Consumers will also be able to add any Web browser to their PCs, to supplement or replace the browsers preinstalled by their computer manufacturer."

-----------------------------
BY Mike Harvey, technology correspondent, San Francisco
Source:TIMES ONLINE

Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.

微软称上网本不再是威胁已变成机会

微软投资者关系部门总经理比尔·科夫德(Bill Koefoed)周三表示,上网本已经不再是微软的威胁。
##CONTINUE##
最初,大部分上网本都采用Linux系统,即使采用Windows,微软也只能从中获取一小部分利润。因此,上网本的风靡反倒影响了微软营收。

但科夫德周三表示,微软最初将上网本视为营收威胁,但现在却已经变成了机会。他说:“在过去的6-9个月中,Windows上网本市场份额逐渐提升。”

由于Windows Vista对硬件要求太高,因此导致第一代上网本都采用Linux系统。后来,微软允许上网本使用Windows XP系统,从而提高了市场份额。

英国调研机构Ovum今年3月公布的数据显示,尽管Linxu在上网本市场领先一步,但Windows已后来居上。Ovum分析师劳伦特·拉查尔(Laurent Lachal)说:“在Linux强势起步之后,Linux上网本的销售量已经被Windows上网本反超。”

对于今年10月即将上市的Windows 7,微软表示所有版本都支持上网本,但初级版和家庭基础版更适合。

-----------------------------
文章出处:赛迪网
作者:友亚

5 cool cloud computing research projects

Next week's HotCloud conference on cloud computing in San Diego will boast a slew of fresh research into this hottest of IT topics. Here's a glimpse at the work to be showcased at the event (PDFs of some research papers will not be available until the week of June 15 at the HotCloud site):
##CONTINUE##
Nebulas

Researchers from the University of Minnesota have outlined a way to use "distributed voluntary resources -- those donated by end-user hosts -- to form nebulas" that would potentially complement today's managed clouds from companies such as Amazon, IBM and Google. Nebulas could address the needs of service classes that more traditional clouds could not, providing more scalability, more geographical dispersion of nodes and lower cost, the researchers say. Possible users would include those rolling out experimental cloud services and those looking to offer free public services or applications.

Unlike famed volunteer-based computing resources such as SETI@home (now BOINC), nebulas would need to support more complex tasks. Challenges needing to be addressed would include managing highly distributed data and computational resources and coping with failures. "We believe that nebulas can exist as complementary infrastructures to clouds, and can even serve as a transition pathway for many services that would eventually be hosted on clouds," the researchers write in a paper titled "Nebulas: Using Distributed Voluntary Resources to Build Clouds."

(University of Minnesota researchers have a separate project dubbed "Virtual Putty" that sounds intriguing as well. It focuses on the reshaping of virtual machine footprints to satisfy user needs and ease VM management for resource providers.)

CloudViews

Amidst the hype surrounding cloud computing, security issues are often raised, such as those involved with multiple customers having their data and applications sharing the same cloud resources. But researchers at the University of Washington also see lots of opportunity in the fact that Web services and applications will be so closely situated. CloudViews is a Hadoop HBase-supported common storage system being developed by the researchers "to facilitate collaboration through protected inter-service data sharing." The researchers say in a paper called "CloudViews: Communal Data Sharing in Public Clouds" that public cloud providers must facilitate such collaboration -- in the form of data driven, server side mashups -- to ensure the market's growth through development of new Web services.

Trusted Cloud Computing Platform

Researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Software Systems have outlined a Trusted Cloud Computing Platform that "enables Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) providers such as Amazon EC2 to provide a closed box execution environment that guarantees confidential execution of guest virtual machines." Such a platform would assure customers that service providers haven't been messing with their data and would enable service providers to secure data even across many VMs. The researchers, in a paper titled "Towards Trusted Cloud Computing," acknowledge that details of how cloud providers set up their data centers is held pretty close to the vest, but base their system on an open source offering called Eucalyptus that they suspect is similar to at least some commercial implementations. A prototype based on the design is this research team's next step.

Private Virtual Infrastructure (PVI) and Locator Bot

Also addressing the security and confidentiality issues surrounding cloud computing is University of Maryland, Baltimore County researcher John Krautheim. His proposal is aimed at better sharing the risk responsibility between the cloud provider and customer, giving the customer much more control than is typically the case. "A method of combining the requirements of the user and provider is to let the clients control the security posture of their applications and virtual machines while letting the service provider control the security of the fabric. This provides a symbiotic security stance that can be very powerful provided both parties hold up their end of the agreement," Krautheim writes. He adds that this setup calls for big-time trust on both sides (including support for a virtualized Trusted Platform Module, or TPM, for storing cryptographic keys), since they'll need to share security information between themselves and possibly with others. Components of this approach will include having a method for shutting down VMs if necessary and monitoring/auditing from within and outside the PVI, Krautheim writes in a paper titled "Private Virtual Infrastructure for Cloud Computing."

Trading storage for computation

One way to make cloud computing more efficient and cost effective might involve rethinking the way data is stored. Researchers at the University of California, Santa Cruz, NetApp and Pergamum Systems are looking at the trade-offs between storing data, including data that might not be called on that often, and simply recalculating results as needed. In a paper titled "Maximizing Efficiency By Trading Storage for Computation" the researchers write: "Recomputation as a replacement for storage fits well into the holistic model of computing described by the cloud architecture. With its dynamically scalable, and virtualized architecture, cloud computing aims to abstract away the details of underlying infrastructure. In both public and private clouds, the user is encouraged to think in terms of services, not structure."

Determining the best way to store and retrieve data requires a cost-benefits analysis based on insights from both the cloud operator and the data user because "neither has a completely informed view," the researchers write. They argue that the nature of cloud computing, with its dynamically allocated computing resources, could lend itself to storing information about the whereabouts and origins of data and then just recomputing results as needed. But they acknowledge that this sort of system would require forecasting where prices would be headed and figuring out things such as the cost of not being able to immediately access data.

-----------------------------
BY Bob Brown (Network World)
Source:CIO

Copyright 2009 IDG Communications. ABN 14 001 592 650. All rights reserved.

OpenSolaris ported to ARM chips

Sun Microsystems' OpenSolaris project has quietly announced the operating system that just added support for Sparc has now been ported to ARM - commonly used in embedded devices, handhelds and, increasingly, netbooks.
##CONTINUE##
It is perhaps an indication of how just stressful things are at Sun these days, with the $5.6bn acquisition by Oracle hanging over it combined with what's shaping up as terrible fiscal fourth-quarter results coming ahead of the crucial July 16 vote by shareholders on the Oracle deal, that no one at Sun or OpenSolaris mentioned the ARM port was coming when announcing OpenSolaris 2009.06 last week.

The leader for the ARM port of OpenSolaris is William Kucharski, who leads the PowerPC and container development efforts for Solaris and who is also the leader of the port to IBM's System z mainframes.

IBM and Sun made some noise about this mainframe port last November when IBM finally and officially sanctioned the deployment of OpenSolaris on mainframe engines configured originally to run Linux. Since then, this Sirius variant of OpenSolaris has gone about as far as the Polaris port for Power iron: just this side of nowhere.

Late last year, Sun announced that OpenSolaris was supported on Intel's Atom processors.

It is hard to imagine there is a lot of room for OpenSolaris on the kinds of devices served bv Atom-based processors, a market where Linux is finding a home and Windows could extend its existing PC hegemony. Linux is being customized by many different projects - there's Google's Android and Intel's Moblin for netbooks and possibly for so-called "smartbooks" - plus the question of whether Microsoft will port the Windows client operating system commonly found on laptops and desktops to ARM. Windows Mobile already runs on ARM-based phones.

Then again, a good device can drive the operating systems’ sale. Look at the iPhone. End users and consumers buying these new classes of computers don't really care what the operating system is, even if the vendor does. And that means OpenSolaris might have a better chance on netbooks and smartbooks and other devices than it does on the desktop.

Of course, this would have to be true by definition, since OpenSolaris has very little chance on desktops outside of the Solaris developer community.

One problem with OpenSolaris on ARM-based machines is the relative lack of applications. OpenSolaris 2009.06 has 1,700 applications, as this review of the operating system at Ars Technica correctly pointed out, a lot lower than the 26,000 packages in the Ubuntu repository, for example.

While the OpenSolaris repository has most of what developers need to create code as part of their day jobs or hobbies, ARM-based machines are all about end-user applications.

The OpenSolaris ARM port, as you can see from the updated OpenSolaris 2008.05 release notes, is actually based on the initial 2008.05 Project Indiana release of OpenSolaris, which is now two releases behind.

The ARM port is specifically for NEC's NaviEngine 1 multicore system-on-chip ARM processor and a reference board outlined in the release notes. There’s no word on when the ARM port will catch up and be part of the standard releases, or when other ARM chips and products will get support.

-----------------------------
BY Timothy Prickett Morgan
Source:The Register

© Copyright 1998–2009.

* Windows 7 vs. Snow Leopard: Why 7 Is More Substantial

With Snow Leopard finally been given a release date and a price, the comparisons with Windows 7 are starting to pop up all over the place, especially focussing on the price aspect of things. While Apple's move to price Snow Leopard at 29 USD for Leopard owners is a very welcome one, the move doesn't mean that Microsoft is getting a price beating from Apple.
##CONTINUE##
No soup for you!
There are a few very important aspects to this whole pricing issue that many seem to overlook. The most important one is that the 29 USD will get you an upgrade copy. Not a full version. If Apple's past behaviour with its Up-to-Date program is anything to go by, this means that you will need Leopard installed before you can install your copy of Snow Leopard, and that if you want to perform a clean install, you'll need to install Leopard first, and Snow Leopard second.

In addition, Apple still hasn't made anything known about a possible full retail version of Snow Leopard, and its possible price tag. This is an issue for users for Mac OS X Tiger, since they will not be able to buy Snow Leopard for 29 USD; instead, Apple suggests Tiger users buy a box set which includes iWork and iLife, which comes in at 169 USD.

While this 169 gives you some good value for your money, this price is actually not lowered at all - previous box sets, with Leopard and Tiger as the operating system, also went for 169 USD. This means that Tiger users will not benefit at all from the 29 USD price tag for Leopard. On top of that, what if you don't want or need newer versions of iLife and iWork? What if you already have them? What if you don't care about them at all? Apple is punishing Tiger users for not having upgraded to Leopard.

On the Windows 7 side, things look much, much brighter. Windows XP users are also eligible for the Windows 7 upgrade sets, so that people who bought their operating system in 2001 (!) are still eligible for the upgrade; that means 8 years of Windows purchases covered, versus only 2 (!) years of Mac OS X purchases covered.

Then there's the issue of hardware cut-off points. Both Snow Leopard and Windows 7 went on a diet compared to their predecessors, and will see performance improvements on the same hardware. However, Windows 7 has a major advantage in that it can run on hardware that's even as old as 7 years - my Pentium 4 2.8Ghz with 2GB of RAM from 2002 does its job as a Windows 7 media centre outstandingly, inlcudig instant sleep/hibernate/wake cycles, full HD playback, and all the bells and whistles.

Snow Leopard, on the other hand, will only run on Intel Macs, meaning that high-end machines still sold in August 2006 (PowerMac G5), with pretty hefty price tags, are now left in the cold. In other words, it is much more likely that Windows users will be able to run Windows 7 without having to invest in new hardware than Mac users do with Snow Leopard.

On top of all this comes the fact that the 29 USD price for Snow Leopard doesn't even compete with Windows 7's prices. As said, the 29 USD is for Leopard owners only, meaning that the price is utterly irrelevant when talking about switchers; they simply don't benefit one bit from this pricing.

All in all, the 29 USD price is nothing but a (very welcome) gift to loyal Apple users who diligently emptied their wallets every time Apple asked them to, while the Windows 7 upgrade prices benefit even the most non-loyal Microsoft customers, even those who punished Microsoft for the abysmal Vista fiasco by, well, not buying into Vista. Seen in this light, Microsoft's upgrade prices - which are still not confirmed, but will probably be round and about 50-70 for Windows 7 Home Premium, and 100-120 for Professional, seem a lot more useful to a lot more people.

Which is the better upgrade?
This is a really intriguing question. Which of the two operating system upgrades provide more value for your money? The problem with this one is that it includes a comparison to their predecessors, making it a little bit more complicated.

Snow Leopard is truly a release where the under-the-hood stuff is more important than user-visible changes. OpenCL, Grand Central, removal of PowerPC code, fully 64bit, they all aid in making Snow Leopard faster and leaner. There are also some interface tweaks, but they are small (but useful!), and certinaly don't draw that much attention.

Windows 7 is a completely different story. Microsoft has made the operating system perform better than Windows Vista (and every report confirms that), with some even claiming performance on par with Windows XP, especially on more recent hardware. It could very well be that Snow Leopard gives a more substantial improvement in this area, but Snow Leopard has it easy; only very recent and powerful 64bit machines will see this benefit. Windows 7's (possibly) more modest performance gains over Vista will benefit machines that are much older and/or much less powerful. For instance, both that old Pentium 4 box as well as my low-spec Acer Aspire One perform better with Windows 7 than with Vista. Similarly aged and/or specced Macs can't even run Snow Leopard at all!

However, where the difference really becomes obvious is the interface changes Windows 7 introduces, and all the pulling-together of frameworks and features introduced with Windows Vista, and exposing them to users in much more useful ways than Vista did. The best example of this is Homegroup, which pulls together various technologies and features introduced with Windows Vista, and presents them in a way that makes managing your network and shared files (especially in combination with the Libraries feature) completely painless. Another example is that various driver upgrades no longer require a restart, such as graphics drivers.

The interface of Windows itself has also been massively cleaned up compared to Vista. It really takes some intensive usage to reveal just how much of the interface has been cleaned up, made more consistent, and overall prettified without losing functionality. My personal favourite is Windows 7's Explorer file manager, which is such joy to use now, while the Vista one was a busy and clumsy mess. Of course, there are still trouble spots, such as the overly crowded Control Panel.

Snow Leopard simply doesn't bring these kinds of massive interface improvements.

Conclusion
Overall though, while Snow Leopard certainly is a nicely priced upgrade to Leopard, and I'm sure going to buy the Family Pack to upgrade my parents' iMac and my own Mac, it just doesn't compare very favouribly to Windows 7 as an upgrade, in a multitude of aspects: supported machines, previous releases still eligible, and the number of people who are actually able to benefit from the upgrade. On top of that, I believe Windows 7 is a far more substantial upgrade than Snow Leopard, but I'm sure many will disagree with me on that specific one.

-----------------------------
BY Thom Holwerda
Source:OSNews

© 1997-2009 OSNews LLC. All Rights Reserved.

微软将发布免费杀毒软件Morro 已开始内测

微软发言人周三称,该公司已经做好了推出长久以来备受期待的免费杀毒软件的准备,这款软件将与赛门铁克和McAfee的产品展开竞争。
##CONTINUE##
这名发言人称,微软正在内部员工中测试早期版本的免费杀毒软件,将“很快”通过公司网站推出Beta版,但他拒绝透露具体日期。受此消息影响,赛门铁克在纳斯达克午后交易中的股价下跌1.6%,McAfee下跌1.8%,微软则上涨1.1%。

投资者正密切关注这款代号为“Morro”的免费杀毒软件,担心该产品可能损害赛门铁克和McAfee产品的销售,这两家公司的产品能保护预装Windows系统的PC免受黑客攻击,每年因此获得的营收高达数十亿美元。

市场研究机构FBR Capital Markets的分析师丹尼尔·艾夫斯(Daniel Ives)称:“这是一种长期的竞争性威胁”,但近期内的影响则几乎可以忽略不计。

微软此前曾表示,Morro将提供查杀一系列广泛病毒的基本功能,很可能类似于赛门铁克和McAfee售价约为每年40美元的低端个人产品,这两家公司销售量最大的产品则是安全套装软件,具备加密、防火墙、密码保护、家长控制及数据备份功能。

三年前,微软携Live OneCare进入杀毒软件市场,但该软件最终被证明是一种失败的商业产品。去年11月,微软宣布停止提供Live OneCare服务,称其将在2009年底以前推出免费的Morro服务。

分析师称,他们正盼望试用Beta版Morro,以检测这款软件的功能与其竞争者的产品相比如何。微软曾表示,Morro能提供针对病毒、间谍软件、Rootkit和特洛伊木马等多种类型恶意软件的保护功能。

赛门铁克和MaAfee官员均曾表示,他们认为Morro构不成威胁。McAfee发言人乔里斯·埃弗斯(Joris Evers)称,尽管面临市场上已有的免费杀毒软件的竞争,但该公司的增长仍旧强劲,“我们确信自己能与任何进入这一市场的公司展开公平的竞争。”

赛门铁克发言人尚未就此置评,Trend Micro则拒绝置评。

-----------------------------
文章出处:新浪科技
作者:唐风

Red Hat releases Fedora 11, debuts Fedora Community

Fedora 11, the latest version of Red Hat's home user-oriented Linux distro, debuted today.
##CONTINUE##
Community is key with Fedora. As the free, open-source, home-oriented version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux, the Fedora Project relies on the developer and tester community to keep the operating system to its semiannual release schedule. A new version of the OS, Fedora 11, was released today and is available for download.

In terms of major upgrades, Fedora 11 has received several. PackageKit, the software management application introduced in Fedora 9, has been extended from automatically installing new codecs when they're needed to also include new fonts and Internet media types. Audio and video setup has been improved with Fedora 11, which now includes the PulseAudio sound server to simplify audio control; and the Kernel Modsetting feature (KMS) for expedited graphical boot has been expanded to include more graphics processors from Intel, Nvidia, and ATI.

Fingerprint scanning has been simplified into a single authentication mechanism, and package updating has been simplified with the inclusion of Presto, a yum plugin that lessens the amount of data that has to be downloaded for updates.

Fedora 11 also now uses ext4 as the default file system instead of ext3, and also includes improved virtual console, better support for Asian languages with the iBus input method, and the WinGW cross-compiler for developers.

Testing in beta for this release is the Fedora Community portal, which lets developers and contributors more closely interact with the community through a dashboard that tracks the latest contributions, conversations, and updates through a graphical front end.

-----------------------------
BY Tim Conneally
Source:betanews

© 1998-2009 Betanews, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Microsoft spins out software protection tech

Microsoft said on Tuesday that it is spinning out as a separate business a two year-old effort that licenses its software protection technologies to other companies.
##CONTINUE##
In the past two years, Microsoft has signed up 120 companies to use the software activation and licensing technologies, including its own eHome unit. But it decided creating an independent company was the way to go.

The new venture, dubbed InishTech, will be based in Ireland. Microsoft will retain a stake in the company as well as an observer seat on its board of directors. Microsoft also plans to be a customer of the company.

The effort is the latest example of Microsoft spinning out its technology to a start-up. A number of past efforts, such as Inrix and Zumobi (formerly ZenZui), have come from technologies developed within Microsoft's research labs, while others have come from various product teams.

It's part of a broader effort at the company to license its intellectual property, a push that dates back to late 2003.

Not all of the start-ups have continued with their original business plans, however. Microsoft spun out a social-networking technology, known as Wallop, in 2006. A start-up by that name hoped to launch its own social network based on the technology, but ultimately decided to join, rather than try to beat the likes of Facebook and Bebo. The company now develops applications for social networks.

-----------------------------
BY Ina Fried, CNET News.com
Source:ZDNet

Copyright © 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved.

iPhone软件销售火爆催生新盈利模式

苹果iPhone(手机上网)手机应用程序开发人员在家中或车库中卖出了大量游戏,日子过得有滋有味。如今又悄然出现了一种靠为iPhone手机编写软件赚钱的新模式——先是销售应用程序软件,接着将公司也卖出去。
##CONTINUE##
开拓新市场的重要途径
2007年以来,苹果应用程序商店的软件下载次数超过10亿,而iPhone和iPod Touch的销量亦超过4000万部,所以,越来越多的企业将手机行业看作是稳定的营收来源。近来,由巴里•迪勒(Barry Diller)创建的互联网巨头InterActiveCorp(简称IAC)和亚马逊都收购了应用软件开发商。而小企业则开始开发新的功能,欲从中分得一杯羹。

由于苹果的经验表明新的应用程序可以推动手机销售,应用程序市场正在快速发展。Palm、RIM、诺基亚和微软都针对运行于各自操作系统上的手机建立自己的应用程序商店。另外,一些企业还在为运行于谷歌Android的手机开发应用程序。但是,大多数开发努力仍集中于iPhone手机应用程序上,这使得本周在旧金山召开的苹果全球开发者大会备受开发人员和潜在投资者的关注。

开发人员将在这次大会上展示专门为苹果最新软件打造的新产品。苹果的最新软件可以让用户订阅应用程序服务,轻松购买附件软件(add-ons),如达到更高游戏水平的捷径或额外的城市导航。营收增加的潜力可能会让买家寻求收购软件开发商的兴趣大增。

移动分析公司Pinch Media联合创始人格雷格•亚德利(Greg Yardley)说:“在升级以后,用户对iPhone应用程序的兴趣将更加浓厚。因为现在可以销售虚拟商品,我们会看到一些围绕iPhone手机的商业模式出现。”由于很多企业寻求为其产品和服务开发手机应用程序,所以,开发人员对应用程序的兴趣日趋浓厚。他们将此视为在互联网之外开拓新市场的一个途径。

比网站更可靠的营收来源
尽管很多应用程序是免费的,但用户有时愿意花99美分或更多钱去购买软件,企业由此认为,应用程序或许是比网站更可靠的营收来源。风险投资公司Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers合伙人马特•墨菲(Matt Murphy)说:“一些企业心想,‘我们怎么才能与iPhone手机沾上边呢?’”该公司管理着一个总额1亿美元的基金,专门用于向开发iPhone手机应用程序的初创企业投资。

墨菲说:“这些企业并非全力开发自己的产品,而是将目光瞄准前景光明的应用程序。”一款不错的iPhone专业应用程序的开发成本一般在5万美元左右。据墨菲介绍,如果在围绕iPhone平台的市场上站稳了脚跟,企业便可利用大批稳定而忠诚的用户资源。他说,对于一家试图迅速进军移动市场的大企业来说,“百万用户其实比iPhone本身更重要。”

这便是InterActiveCorp采取的策略。InterActiveCorp旗下拥有35家互联网企业,包括Ask.com、CollegeHumor和Evite。上个月,该公司收购了西雅图的初创企业UrbanSpoon,收购数额不详。UrbanSpoon提供全美众多城市的餐饮指南服务,拥有一款iPhone应用程序软件,这款软件是苹果应用程序商店上最受欢迎的产品之一,迄今下载次数已接近500万。

移动战略重要组成
IAC发言人莱斯利•卡弗蒂(Leslie Cafferty)表示:“iPhone是我们移动战略的重要组成部分。开发一款应用软件需要投入很多,选择一款现有软件自然更具吸引力。”IAC旗下城市导航网站Citysearch率先与UrbanSpoon合作进行联合投资,同时对这家创业公司的网站进行评估。卡弗蒂说,去年7月,这款iPhone应用软件首次登台亮相,那时的它“就是蛋糕上的糖衣”。

UrbanSpoon其中一位创始人伊桑•劳里(Ethan Lowry)表示,对于UrbanSpoon的3位创始人而言,UrbanSpoon被一家规模更大的公司收购在一定程度上是一种机会主义行为。他说:“它让我们考虑所能提供的更多类型的服务以及服务的稳定性。一家规模更大的公司的安全性体现在能够在一定程度上缓解财务压力。”

Amazon 及其Kindle电子书阅读器也将手机应用软件作为拓展其销售的电子书市场的一种途径。4月晚些时候,Amazon收购了Stanza。Stanza是一种软件服务,允许用户通过手机浏览一个拥有10万部图书的图书馆并从中购买自己喜欢的图书。

创业公司参与其中
时至今日,iPhone已经变得越来越普及,对手机应用软件的需求也不断提高。意识到这一趋势的绝不仅仅是规模更大的公司,创业公司也是如此,例如位于加利福尼亚州帕洛•阿尔托的Tapulous。7月,Tapulous从开发商Nate True手里收购了游戏《Tap Tap Revenge》。这款游戏与《吉他英雄》等视频游戏类似,挑战玩家与流行音乐的节奏保持步调一致。

根据市场研究公司comScore提供的数据,iTunes应用软件商店的每3名买家中便有1人购买《Tap Tap Revenge》。Tapulous CEO安德鲁•莱西(Andrew Lacy)表示:“能够与W.W.D.C。(世界开发者大会)的人建立纽带,我们都感到非常兴奋。在音乐游戏领域,他们能够提出有趣的想法并开发有趣的软件。”

其它公司正开展一项业务,具体做法是:获取原始程序并进行重新设计和打磨,而后向应用软件商店发布。位于旧金山的视频游戏创业公司Ngmoco专注于发行可在iPhone 和 iPod Touch上运行的游戏。最近,这家游戏公司收购了由英国开发人员西蒙•奥利弗(Simon Oliver)设计的益智游戏《Rolando》。

Ngmoco CEO尼尔•杨(Neil Young)表示:“创建公司时,我们便认定最理想的商业模式就是充分利用开发人员的力量,并将他们开发的游戏产品投向市场。”Ngmoco也进行游戏的内部开发,但通常采取的方式还是锁定外部开发人员,了解他们的下一步动向。从目前的形势来说,Ngmoco借助外力的方式收到了良好效果,他们的很多游戏在应用软件商店的最受欢迎游戏排行榜中获得较高排名。未来两个月,Ngmoco将发布4款游戏,另有15款新游戏正在开发之中,其中包括《Rolando》的几个续集。

-----------------------------
文章出处:新浪科技
作者:杨琳

互联网实验室与BSA再辩软件盗版率 提新质疑

一场关于中国软件盗版率到底是多少的“辩论赛”再次开幕。BSA与IDC在5月底针对互联网实验室的质疑做了回应,互联网实验室9日又对这些“回应”进行了回应,并提出了两个新的质疑。
##CONTINUE##
BSA及IDC对互联网实验室的新回应暂未置评。

以下为互联网实验室发给新浪科技的相关说明。
1、互联网实验室提出的质疑之一:“在基本概念上,BSA计算的只是PC软件的盗版率,却误导人们当成整个软件产业的盗版率。盗版软件造成的经济损失,相对于计算机软件产品市场和相对于整个软件产业的比率是不同的,前者比后者要大得多。

如果认为整个软件产业的盗版率是80%,则2008年度软件产业的潜在价值应为3.8万亿元,相当于电信业的60%,全国GDP的13%,这显然是很荒唐的。”

BSA及IDC的答复:关于新近发布的全球PC软 件第六次年度盗版研究报告,以及之前的研究报告,我们一直明确说明本盗版率研究只是针对PC软件,不包括其它软件。为了避免被误解为是所有软件的盗版率, 我们一直在文档和对外沟通中反复强调本研究只是针对PC软件的。所以也不能仅通过PC软件的盗版率去推算整体软件产业的潜在价值。

互联网实验室再次回应:BSA和IDC十三年来一直在混淆概念,进行误导,把PC软件的盗版率误导成整个软件产业的盗版率。在06年之前,BSA的新闻稿里一直都是软件产业盗版率,尽量回避PC软件盗版率的说法。自从互联网实验室连续推出中国的软件盗版率报告之后,BSA和IDC才迫于压力在新闻稿里做出了修改。但是需要指出的是,直到今天,他们报告的封面标题仍然全部用软件盗版率。

虽然在互联网实验室报告的压力下,BSA和IDC也做出了一些姿态,但是媒体和美国政府依旧把他们的数字当作了软件产业的盗版率,例如前段时间美国国会公布年度的盗版观察名单,中国在头五位之内,依旧就是BSA和IDC的数据。对于媒体和美国政府的错误理解,BSA和IDC明知是被错误引用也从来不做任何澄清的工作。

2、互联网实验室提出的质疑之二:“在计算方法上,BSA用数量盗版率代替价值盗版率去估算经济损失,不能体现盗版多出现在低价格软件的事实,严重高估了盗版的经济影响。BSA 的盗版率是按照计算机软件安装数量计算的,而在计算盗版造成的经济损失时,却直接运用数量盗版率代替了价值盗版率,导致对软件盗版的经济影响估计过高。实 际上,数量盗版率反映的是盗版行为的普遍性,价值盗版率则反映盗版行为的经济危害。”

BSA及IDC的答复:本研究提到的盗版率是基于数量的盗 版率,这已经在报告和方法论中明确提出。至于计算盗版带来的损失方面,我们采用的是用盗版软件的数量乘以如果销售的价值,包括通过零售、OEM、捆绑销 售、以及免费获得等多种渠道获得的盗版软件。我们已经在报告中明确解释了为什么我们认为这等同于盗版带来的损失。

互联网实验室再次回应:BSA报告中,对于其用数量盗版率计算经济损失的说明是极不严谨的、是缺乏理论依据的,不值得争论。

即使按照BSA的说法,认为使用盗版都是正版的损失,那么,对于具有同等价格的单类软件来说,确实是可以把数量盗版率当成是经济损失率的。但是,BSA的数量盗版率是一个整体平均概念,包含了所有PC软件,而这些软件的数量盗版率是不同的,价格更是差别巨大,数量盗版率与价值损失就绝不能相互替代。

同样的整体盗版率水平,如果低价值类盗版率高而高价值类盗版率低,则其经济损失相对较小;而如果低价值类盗版率低而高价值类盗版率高,则其经济损失相对较大。因此,混用数量盗版率和价值盗版率是错误的。

互联网实验室另外提出两个质疑:
一,免费开源软件的安装比例最大不超过20%吗?
BSA报告中把当年安装的PC软件分为三大类,即合法付费软件(Legitimate Paid-for Software)、免费开源软件(Free or Open-Source)、盗版软件(Pirated),而盗版率就是指盗版软件数量占这三类软件总数量的比率。在此概念下,盗版率最大的取值范围就是除去免费开源软件后的比例有多大,即(1-免费开源软件比例)。

在BSA第六次全球盗版研究报告中,认为全球免费开源软件的比例是15%,但没有关于中国的数据。“2008年中国软件盗版率调查”课题组的研究结果表明,本年度中国免费开源软件比例是64%。也就是说,按BSA的盗版率计算公式,中国PC软件盗版率的极限值为36%,哪里会有80%的盗版率呢?或者反过来说,如果按照BSA中国软件盗版率80%计算,则免费开源软件与正版软件的总和最大也不超过20%,这显然远离事实。

二,操作系统盗版率下降40%只能带来总体盗版率下降2%吗?
据“2008年中国软件盗版率调查”课题组的研究结果,在2006年盗版率曾经高达68%的操作系统软件,随“强制预装正版操作系统”政策的实施和“软件正版化”工作的迅速推进,2007年已经下降至39%,2008年进一步下降为29%,近三年中盗版率水平已经下降了近40%。而据BSA的数据,中国PC软件盗版率2006年和2007年均为82%,2008年为80%,三年中仅下降了2%。

曾经盗版现象最严重、最普遍的操作系统软件盗版率的大幅度下降,难道对于整体盗版率下降的影响竟然如此微不足道吗?

-----------------------------
文章出处:新浪科技
作者:N/A

iPhone 3.0 Software Will Be Available June 17. Free for iPhone Users, $9.95 for iPod Touch

Today Apple recapped the highlights of its new iPhone 3.0 software and revealed a few new features, including the ability to download TV and movies over Wi-Fi and a faster Safari browser. There’s also a clever new Find my iPhone feature that will locate your device via GPS, but you will need to be a Mobile Me customer ($99) per year.
##CONTINUE##
iPhone 3.0 will be available starting June 17 for iPhone users and for iPod touch. It will $9.95 for that device.

Apple also showed some cool new apps that tap into iPhone 3.0’s SDK. These include Asphalt 5 (a racing game), Iceberg Reader (for downloading text books and magazines, in addition to regular books), and TomTom (for turn-by-turn GPS).

Cut and paste works across all applications and has undo support. It will also be developer friendly. Users can now type in landscape mode in Mail, Notes, and Messages. MMS allows you to send and receive photos, audio files, and locations over the cell network in real time, all in the same app. AT&T support is coming later this summer for MMS. Why not today? Maybe the network needs to be updated to handle all those media messages.

Spotlight search can find a message you’re looking for. You can use it to find not only e-mail but also Apps. With iTunes, there are some enhancements. You can rent and purchase movies now right from your phone. It also includes TV shows and audio books. Support for iTunes U is right on the phone for education.

Parental controls now gets new features. These include movie shows, TV shows, and apps based on age. Moving on to tethering. This allows you to share your iPhone’s Internet connection with your computer. Works over wired USB or Bluetooth. Apple promises seamless experience on Mac and PC. Apple has announced multiple carriers but not AT&T!

Apple promises 3x faster Javascript support on Safari browser. New HTTP streaming audio and video that automatically picks the best connection. Uses contact info on your phone to fill out Web forms. Auto-fill. iPhone 3.0 also sports HTML 5 support.

With new Find my iPhone feature it will let you locate your device online and send a message that will be audible even if it’s in mute mode. You can also erase all the data remotely. All smart phones should have this feature.

Scott Forstall now going over in-app purchases. Nothing new here but it’s good to know that free apps will remain free. With new peer-to-peer support you can find other devices and connect the two without pairing. Should be good for games. Accessories can talk to the iPhone and share information in new ways. Companion apps can talk over dock connector or Bluetooth.

So what about Maps? Easy for developers to embed Google map service in any application. Will allow devs to do turn-by-turn directions. Push notifications also recapped, which will deliver text and audio alerts and work with apps like instant messaging and ESPN for sports scores.

-----------------------------
BY Mark Spoonauer
Source:LAPTOP

Copyright © 2000-2008 Bedford Communications, Inc.

Palm Pre apps and Palm's App Catalog: A closer look

The Palm Pre might have a slick OS and stylish hardware, but when it comes to apps, it has a long road ahead of it.
##CONTINUE##
The Palm Pre might have a slick OS and stylish hardware, but when it comes to apps, it has a long road ahead of it. The Apple iPhone OS has the largest (more than 35,000 apps now) and most comprehensive native app store of any mobile operating system. And if Palm wants WebOS and the Pre to challenge Apple's smartphone juggernaut, it's going to have to step up its apps game. But Palm's App Catalog shows a lot of promise: Its design makes navigating and shopping for apps from the Pre easy, and many of the apps take full advantage of WebOS's best features.

The App Catalog: Sparse but Well Organized

Palm's App Catalog for WebOS can be accessed via the Pre's Launcher menu. The home screen of the App Catalog lists Featured apps and Popular apps horizontally, accompanied by each app's title and star rating. Beneath those two rows of listings, the Top Tags content appears; it consists of entries in various app categories such as Most Recent, Top Rated, Entertainment, and News.

Another option is to use a WebOS feature called Universal Search to search for an app. Simply start typing the name and a list of matches will come up. At launch, the App Catalog will contain only a dozen or so available apps.

Clicking an app listing brings up its description, a few screenshots, and links to view user reviews or to add your own. You'll also find a link to the developer's homepage, in case you need app support. You can either purchase and download the app (if it is a paid app) or try a time-limited trial version. The apps I selected downloaded quickly and appeared immediately in the Pre's Launcher menu. If an update becomes available for an app that you've already purchased, an 'Update' icon will appear in place of 'Download' on the app's info page. Palm has yet to announce how paid apps will work within the catalog; all of the apps available so far are free.

WebOS Apps: Future Stars?

Palm has stated that the company's intention in building WebOS on standard Web technologies such as HTML, Javascript, and CSS was to spare developers from having to learn a new programming language. As a result, developers should be able to create apps easier and faster.

Initially, Mojo, WebOS's software developer kit (SDK), was available only to a select developers. This will change, however, when the public SDK debuts. According to Palm's VP of global sales, the public SDK is "very close to launch." The kit uses application programming interfaces (APIs) that allow developers to integrate WebOS's features--such as gesture-based navigation, Universal Search, and Notifications--into their applications.

Karl Stillner, the vice president of business development at Zumobi, an app development company, agrees. He says that he has heard very good feedback about the platform from Zumobi's developers. He notes that his company's apps (a Today Show and Sporting News Baseball app) run faster on WebOS than any other platform it works with.

I've looked at a few of the new WebOS applications and like what I've seen so far. My favorites:

Google Maps, which comes preloaded on the Pre, integrates WebOS's Universal Search feature quite well. You can access Google Maps from the home screen by typing your location. Universal Search will initially list results from your contacts and apps and then give you the option to search Google Maps (you can also search Google, Twitter and Wikipedia). You can also take advantage of the Pre's multitasking capabilities by running your calendar and Maps simultaneously. I found this incredibly helpful for scheduling my weekend: I could make plans with friends, put them in my calendar and then search for locations without closing out of either app.

A YouTube app comes installed on the Pre as well. You can search all videos by simply typing, or you can view the most popular or highly rated videos from the provided lists. The Pre always displays the videos in landscape mode and delivers them in H.264 format, regardless of whether you connected over Wi-Fi or EvDO. You can't comment or rate videos, however--an annoying omission.

Fandango and Pandora, both of which are available from the App Catalog, were definitely my favorites among the dozen or so apps I looked at--because of how they integrated with WebOS. Fandango uses the Pre's location-based services to find theaters in your area. You can also watch movie trailers, buy tickets, and add showtimes to your calendar--again without having to close the app.

Meanwhile, Pandora capitalizes on the Pre's multitasking capabilities by running discreetly in the background while you use other apps. Song and artist titles appear in the Notifications area, so you don't have to reopen the app to figure out what you're listening to. You can also pause and give thumbs up/thumbs down judgments from Notifcations. If you want to skip a song, just tap the 'P' in the bottom corner of your screen to pull up the app.

Palm OS Apps Work on Pre

The lack of WebOS apps at launch is admittedly disappointing. Palm says that many older Palm OS apps will work on the Pre (though, clearly, they won't take advantage of the new hardware and software). To use the older apps, you'll have to download MotionApps Classic app, a Palm OS simulator that runs in WebOS; fortunately this app is available at launch.

Read the full review of the Palm Pre and see how WebOS compares to other smartphones.

-----------------------------
BY Ginny Mies
Source:PCWorld

Copyright 2009 IDG Communications. ABN 14 001 592 650. All rights reserved.

China Plans To Pre-install Software For Preventing Viewing Of Pornographic Websites

According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, the Chinese government hopes to pre-install web censoring software in PCs sold in China after July 1 to block some banned websites.
##CONTINUE##
The Chinese government has reportedly sent notices to major PC makers, but has not released the requirement to the public. The software, which is called "Green Dam Filter Software", is mainly used to block pornographic websites, aiming to prevent young people from harmful information about illegal sex acts.

According to Bryan Zhang, founder of the software developer Zhengzhou Jinhui Computer System Engineering, the company plans to pass the addresses of the banned websites to PCs via an Internet updating system and the updating method of the software is like those of operating system software and anti-virus software.

A representative from China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology told Chinese news website Hexun.com that the Wall Street Journal saw a copy of the notice, which stated PC makers should pre-install the Green Dam software in their PCs sold after July 1, 2009. The notice also states that the PC makers can pre-install the software in the hard discs or offer the software disc with the computers. In addition, PC makers should report the shipment volume of PCs with the software to the government.

-----------------------------
BY China Tech News Staff
Source:China Tech News

Copyright 1999-2009 ChinaTechNews.com. All Rights Reserved.

And Moses asked God: Is Mac better than Windows?

I once was a God-fearing Windows user. But when an Apple shrine, uh, store opened in my area, I began to ask myself the age-old question that has confounded even the greatest biblical prophets: Is the Mac better?
##CONTINUE##
I avoided the Mac for years for the usual reason cited by the Windows faithful: a dearth of hardware and software. (The so-called Mac tax was never really an issue for me.) That said, I won't go into a broad platform critique because I risk rehashing Windows-versus-Mac religious arguments that have been repeated millions of times for (digital-age) eons. (Besides, I'll leave that faith-based debate to the digerati of the world.)

Suffice to say, I now use a MacBook full time. Though, in the spirit of complete disclosure, I do have a Vista-based HP tower that I still use when there's something I absolutely can't do on the Mac. And, no, I have not gone the Boot Camp or virtual machine route yet.

So, without getting into an unwieldy philosophical argument, there are some nuts-and-bolts things that make the transition a challenge (and it's different for everyone, as every user has different needs.)

And one more disclaimer: I'm writing this from the perspective of a Mac neophyte/new user. Not as a seasoned Macophile that can instantly troubleshoot issues as they pop up.

Docking stations (lack thereof): This is a biggie. I had grown attached to the convenience of Hewlett-Packard docking stations. Apple should have connectors for docking stations (or port-replicators) built into MacBooks. The ease of popping an HP business laptop--which I had been using for years--in and out of a docking station cannot be overstated.

Microsoft Entourage: This is not the Windows Outlook equivalent. In a word, it's slow. In two words, very slow. (Note: I can't use the OS X "Mail" client because it can't run the email programs that I use.)

Web compatibility: All things should be equal here. But they're not. Like many people, I use both Safari and FireFox. Last week, there was a live video stream that, while it loaded on my MacBook Air, wouldn't run. The applet was there but it wasn't streaming. I didn't have time to figure out why it wasn't streaming. I just needed it to work. Out of desperation, I tried it on the Vista-based HP tower. It streamed immediately. In my book, that's a problem. And generally, on many Web sites that I use, Windows Media Player (that is, WMP v.11) is more adept at streaming video than the applets that come standard on the Mac OS X platform.

OS X local search: OS X local search is great (e.g., Spotlight) but it won't let me exclusively search a folder full of JPEG files. This issue was validated by a Mac "Genius" at my local Apple Store who admitted it was "odd." Let me repeat, an Apple Genius verified that I could not do this. Of course, I can find these files a dozen other ways but there's an application I use everyday that would be a lot easier to use if I could search JPEG files exclusively in that folder.

(Update: After a second visit to my local Apple Store and a separate discussion about changing the user short name--which the Genius did, as this process is a little tricky--I can now do JPEG searches on one of my MacBooks. I do not know how this came to be fixed, however, as it was an unintended consequence.)

Hardware compatibility--in this case, camcorders: I found this out quite by accident. I was in my local Best Buy (Southern California) and overheard one of those illuminating matter-of-fact dialogs between a customer and a salesperson. "Are all of these camcorders Mac compatible?"--the customer asked. "No," the salesman said. "Only the Panasonic and Canon." After the salesman was done helping the customer, I followed up with more queries. The upshot: Most other brands are not Mac-compatible, according to the Best Buy sales force. Does a Best Buy salesperson always know the bottom-line, gospel truth about hardware compatibility? Probably not. But the larger point is that's what he is telling customers. And it's always an ugly reminder of that cliche that a lot hardware is not compatible with the Mac.

The Mac philosophy of how to use external displays: This, I suppose, is more a philosophical argument than a practical argument. But, to me, the way Windows handles external displays (with a laptop) using Fn-F4 is straightforward and extremely practical. And--returning to the lack-of-a-docking-station argument--inserting/removing a laptop into/from an HP dock is so well executed that it becomes second nature to the user: the internal laptop display shuts off, the external display goes on, and the external display automatically adjusts the resolution. Again, this may be partially a case of me simply being more accustomed to the Windows way of doing things--but not completely: Windows wins the ease-of-use award here.

No built-in 3G option: I've talked about this before in other posts. HP, Dell, and others offer integrated 3G connectivity. That said, I fully expect that this will become less of an issue when 4G hits, as I am confident that Apple is savvy enough to stay in front of this trend.

Of course, the list goes on (lack of development momentum from some software vendors on the Mac, being another minus often cited). But I would be remiss at this point to not preemptively answer the critics who will say, "Well, if you're going to whine all the time, go back to Windows you a#%*!#@." (And that's putting it charitably. Mac minions tend to be slightly more contemptuous.)

The reason I switched to Mac (if anyone really cares) was hardware, not software. I looked at all of the HP, Dell, Lenovo, and Sony laptops and saw nothing that came close to a MacBook Air. Not even remotely close. The Air is an incomparably well-balanced design that is light, fast, and aesthetically a knockout, to boot. The other unibody MacBooks inherit these attributes too.

Oh yeah, Mac OS X beats Windows in a lot of ways. You can run Windows, after all, if you choose, with Boot Camp or VMware Fusion. And all of the well-known virtues are true. You're not constantly on Virus/Worm/Malware alert, the interface is more intuitive in some ways, it's more streamlined than Vista, it boots faster, and the list goes on. I guess I can live without a docking station--for now.

So, as of summer 2009, which is better, Windows or Mac? Dare I ask?

-----------------------------
BY Brooke Crothers
Source:cnet

Brooke Crothers is a former editor at large at CNET News.com, and has been an editor for the Asian weekly version of the Wall Street Journal. He writes for the CNET Blog Network, and is not a current employee of CNET. Contact him at mbcrothers@gmail.com. Disclosure.

©2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved.

微软封杀混合硬盘上网本

微软已经向上网本制造商发布了禁止在混合硬盘(装备固态硬盘和传统硬盘两种硬盘)环境下使用Windows XP Home操作系统的禁令。
##CONTINUE##
此限制条款将成为微软所推行的Windows XP上网本不能“超过1GB内存”,“显示屏不能超过10英寸”之后的第三条限制条款。目前受此条款影响的只有微星Wind U115上网本,因为这款上网本在微软发布声明之前上市,所以它有可能在6月底才会退市。

微星U115上网本上安装的混合硬盘系统,其中包括预装操作系统的SSD固态硬盘,和作为存储使用的160GB标准2.5英寸传统硬盘。在用户需要的省电模式下,用户可以关闭传统硬盘获得更多使用时间,同时系统安装在固态硬盘中也让系统运行的更快。

据悉,微软增加此限制的原因是,Windows 7系统要在10月份才能上市,微软在此之前并不想让使用Vista操作系统与混合存储方案的高端笔记本失去市场。

-----------------------------
文章出处:驱动之家
作者:N/A

宏碁董事长:Android上网本将预装双系统

宏碁董事长王振堂上周五称,该公司最近宣布即将推出的Android上网本在实际出货时将预装Android和Windows双操作系统。
##CONTINUE##
王振堂指出,对宏碁来说,预装双操作系统的战略要安全得多,原因是就目前而言,消费者对Android系统的接受程度尚不明朗。他表示,宏碁将与电信供应商合作出售Android上网本,预计其出货量将在两到三年内达到平均水准。

王振堂还指出,不排除宏碁推出只预装Android系统之机型的可能,前提是电信供应商的需求足够。

对于GNU/Linux的发烧友来说,这一消息无疑是个打击,原因是他们将宏碁本周早些时候宣布即将推出Android上网本的消息视为消费者空间开源软件重现的迹象。分析师称,宏碁采用双操作系统是一种妥协,而这种妥协不太可能赢得“死硬派”可选操作系统方案拥护者的支持,他们将继续对所谓的“微软税”(Windows tax)高喊“犯规”。

对主流消费者来说,加入Android操作系统所带来的实际效果有限,原因是这一系统无法象一些市场观察家预期的那样,转换为更加廉价的产品。事实上,双操作系统提高了Android上网本的复杂性,可能导致支持成本上升,宏碁将需在售价中计入这一成本;另一方面,宏碁将可把Android作为一种增值功能加以宣传,并以此作为提价的理由,就象华硕的Express Gate那样。

此外,王振堂还预测称,2009年下半年宏碁的笔记本出货量将比上半年增长30%到40%。

-----------------------------
文章出处:新浪科技
作者:唐风
 

Copyright 2008-2009 Daily IT News | Contact Us