##CONTINUE##

The cores (unknown how many and what clocks they will be released at) will support the current x86 ISA, each core will support up to four threads, but also include a new vector processing unit. This 512-bit wide SIMD unit is what the new Larrabee New Instruction set targets. (LRBni for short.)
What Intel is announcing and showing off at the Game Developers Conference today in San Francisco is the first details about the C++ Larrabee library prototype and that it will be made available (immediately we are told) to developers to begin using and testing with. Intel believes this will push developers to “explore the efficiency and flexibility” of Larrabee while providing useful feedback.

In an interview for an Intel-developed magazine, the hardware and software architect behind Larrabee, Tom Forsyth, brought up a couple of interesting new points. First, it was revealed that the Larrabee architecture has been locked down for well over a year now - everything they are working on at this point is optimization in physical hardware design and on the software side. Forsyth also mentioned a couple of near-term features that Larrabee will offer the rasterization pipeline. They include render-target reads (shaders that can read and write the current target to enable more custom blends), demand-page texturing (ability to read from a texture when not all of it exists in memory) and order-independent translucency (allows translucent objects to be rendered just like any other surface type while the GPU does ordering for lighting effects, etc). These are features today that COULD be done with standard GPUs today but have inherent performance penalties for doing so.
If you aren’t a coder and developer, chances are the announcement today just won’t be that interesting. What we were hoping to get from Intel was some sort of scaling factor they would provide to developers for this emulation-mode CPU based test of LRBni and performance of the actual product when it’s released. That would give us SOME kind of hints as to what to expect from Larrabee designs next year. Obviously that didn’t happen; and I wonder how many developers are going to be willing to spend time learning a new programming model for games without more information on the resulting performance benefits.
That being said, this is an important first step to Larrabee’s adoption and we will be monitoring developer response to it very closely.
-----------------------------
BY Ryan Shrout
Source:PC Perspective
Copyright © PC Perspective 2000-2009.
0 comments:
Post a Comment